Why I despise Nationalist Unity by Eddy Morrison

The talk of 'Nationalist Unity' is STILL going the rounds. There can only be ONE Nationalist Party in Britain and all who believe in its basic principles should be in it. That party is the National Front.

The Nationalist groupings range from infantile groups of teenagers waving flashy banners whilst hiding their faces through to Civic Nationalists such as the BNP, BDP, BFP et al from which we should salvage the best nationalists as they will go into the eventual slow decline - for all they are doing is following in Griffin's footsteps, without Griffin. Yes, that's going to work!

The little grouplets with members pictured with hidden faces doing 'daring deeds' such as putting up a banner and claiming it is a world winning achievement to downright anti-National actions such as putting a candidate up to try and spoil the NF vote.

At the 47th Anniversary January Rally held on Saturday the 26th 2014, we had to quite forcefully eject two BDP members who we know are serial 'joiners' and in company with some other political cripples, tour the country with their message of 'unity' - which actually is a message of negativity.

In 1967, the National Front was formed from numerous organisations and declared itself a Movement of Unity. To this very day, the same holds true. The NF adopts a 'Broad Church' stance in which British can hold differing views or tactics as long as they adhere to the NF's fundamental beliefs which have become encapsulated in the "14 Words".. Let me stress this again - we quite simply have NO MORE TIME to play act either as groups of teenagers inventing high sounding names to some veterans who should know better still following the never to be found Holy Grail called 'respectability'. If you are a National Front member then you should not be a member of any other political party. We must be totally ruthless on this!

A man (whose name slips my mind just at the moment) wrote the following below quotation. It is as true today as it ever was.The date it was written was around 1923/24 I think....

"At that period everything which could not stand on its own feet joined one of those co-operative unions, believing that eight lame people hanging on to one another could force a gladiator to surrender to them.

But if among all these cripples there was one who was sound of limb he had to use all his strength to sustain the others and thus he himself was practically paralysed.

We ought to look upon the question of joining these working coalitions as a tactical problem, but, in coming to a decision, we must never forget the following fundamental principle:

Through the formation of a working coalition associations which are weak in themselves can never be made strong, whereas it can and does happen not infrequently that a strong association loses its strength by joining in a coalition with weaker ones. It is a mistake to believe that a factor of strength will result from the coalition of weak groups; because experience shows that under all forms and all conditions the majority represents the duffers and poltroons. Hence a multiplicity of associations, under a directorate of many heads, elected by these same associations, is abandoned to the control of poltroons and weaklings. Through such a coalition the free play of forces is paralysed, the struggle for the selection of the best is abolished and therewith the necessary and final victory of the healthier and stronger is impeded. Coalitions of that kind are inimical to the process of natural development, because for the most part they hinder rather than advance the solution of the problem which is being fought for"