By Lady Michelle Renouf
Here is a video by a spirited Danish videographer of the first two days’ updated info re the Schaefer Siblings’ Trial in Munich.
Later
on today I shall make a further update concerning last Thursday’s
events - the last day of the trial’s first week - with key input from
released prisoner Scientist of Law Sylvia Stolz; Monika Schaufer’s
impressive attorney Wolfram Nahrath; and Alfred on his case thusfar.
Below is a report on the yet again imprisoned situation right now for
Alfred Schaefer.
To
my own amazement, I find I am the only British person who came to
Munich for the entire first week of the Schaufer Siblings trial to
report on it for the English-speaking world. Not an easy task as I do
not know the German language; suddenly I found all my email addresses
were blocked; and my own attorney (same as Monika Schaefer’s) on my
arrival first morning of the Trial advised me not to risk entering the
public gallery given the status of my own vulnerabilty under “criminal”
investigation para 130 for the ad lib I gave at the Dresden Commemoration in February - see that 10 minutes’ speech at http://www.
However,
I report events here straight from the horses mouth - from the
principal participants that is, From the Right End of the Horse!
Here is my revised and updated account of the Trial to date:
Press correspondent for The Barnes Review and the American Free Press, Lady Michèle Renouf writes:
I
am here in Munich on the first day (July 2nd 2018) of the Schaefer
trial (of the Canadian-born Monika and her German-born brother Alfred).
Upon
my arrival at the Munich courthouse this morning, my attorney RA
Wolfram Nahrath ( who also acts today for Monika Schaefer) advised me
not to remain in the courthouse building (much less enter the courtroom)
as likely the same trick will occur upon me as played when the German
police seized Monika (while she attended the former attorney Sylvia
Stolz trial on January 3, 2018). This was when the judge interrupted
that hearing to have Monika dragged off from the public gallery to the
cells (for these past 6 months) to the Munich Prison and likely could be
repeated today once court officials spotted me, as he says they
certainly would, in the public gallery. Since February this year, I have
been under criminal investigation having been charged with Volksverhetzung para
130/ populace incitement which carries a five years’ custodial penalty
following my ad-libbed speech at the Dresden Commemoration. Wiser, our
attorney says – but my call – that I leave immediately the risky
vicinity to instead make reports from a nearby cafe. The parties provide
me with a full account during the intervals of the day’s proceedings –
as a more useful option especially as I not able to comprehend German
language proceedings in any case if witnessing the process.
I
decided to take my attorney’s advice as a more effective option (than
uselessly being hauled off to a prison cell) and so am now sitting with
Henry Hafenmayer as he is not allowed inside the courtroom at this time.
Henry awaits being called as a witness for the Prosecution for being
considered as the video maker (though in fact, he was not Monika’s video
maker).
Though
Scientist of Law Sylvia Stolz warmly thanked me for coming to show
“international affection for the Schaefer siblings” she agrees that my
making daily reports to include this advice, as given by my own
attorney, in fact serves to strengthen the dramatic resonance of the
situation Alfred and his sister Monika are facing in this bewildering
“Alice in Wonderland” anti-National, non-Sovereign German legalese-land
where – ‘first we have the verdict’ then maybe or maybe not we hear the
defendants’ evidence. How else but bewildering can one assess the
nonsensical norm for WW2 historical sceptics where lawyers risk
prosecution themselves if they defend certain clients’ opinions and
findings “too well”? During trials conducted in Mannheim Court, I have
personally witnessed the lawyers acting for artist and publicist Ernst
Zündel, and Planck Institute graduate and chemist Germar Rudolf, finding
themselves charged for “acting too well” for their historical
revisionist clients. Indeed, some of those German lawyers have been
punished with either crippling fines or incarceration for defending
their clients “too well”.
Attorney
Sylvia Stolz (Scientist of Law); Attorney Wolfram Nahrath (Monika
Schaefer’s counsel); Attorney Frank Miksch (Alfred’s counsel); Alfred
Schaefer (Defendant); Lady Renouf (press correspondent for The Barnes
Review and American Free Press)
Alfred
is set upon screening in the courthouse the full story of his political
awakening via the suspect videos. I am only anxious that the judges may
manage to forbid this exposé by him. The great disadvantage here in
Germany is that no transcripts are made of these Processes. I shall do
my best to give you the proceedings as provided to me from the horse’s
mouth.
Day one began at 09.15.
The following was reported to me by valiant former-attorney Sylvia
Stolz. Before the entrance of the two professional judges and the two
lay/Schöffe judges, Alfred was able to hug his handcuffed
sister while the Press photographed them. Judge Hofmann and Judge Federl
entered with the two lay/Schöffe judges but Alfred refused to
stand in any acknowledgment of their authority. To this, the judges
declared Alfred’s disdain as an offence to the rules whilst Alfred
declared them and the Federal Republic of Germany illegitimate since he
adheres to the standing legitimacy of the German Reich.
In
the “curiouser and curiouser” Wonderland world of occupied-German law,
the leading Judge declared the defendants would not be allowed anything
to drink, and if they insisted, the court proceedings would have be
interrupted in recess while they drank water! Alfred instantly demanded a
drink which resulted in Monika in handcuffs being temporarily removed
from the courtroom. Truly a farcical act of “inquisitional” (as Alfred
stated) power-playing to which fittingly Alfred added that the court was
but a farcical “Muppet Show”. (I concur for, in The Great Muppet Caper movie, I act as role-model for Miss Piggy’s catwalk imposture!)
Alfred
was told if he offended again he would be heavily fined for complaining
that the proceedings were inaudible to him and to the public gallery
because Judge Hofmann had ordered that the attorneys not press the live
microphone buttons. This instruction wilfully denies due public access
to hear the proceedings. When Alfred commenced to read his introductory
remarks, the Judge demanded he give only a summary. At this, his
attorney and Monika’s called for an interruption for two hours in order
to draw up a rejection of the sitting judges whom they declared patently
prejudicial to the defendant’s right to express his defence in full.
The “Holocaust”-denial laws adhere to those of the playing-card Queen’s
in Alice in Wonderland wherein these “contrariwise” trials
commence with “Sentence first – then the evidence”….unless one’s lawyer
attempts to defend his/her historical revisionist client “too well” and
then the lawyer also is prosecuted for “defending the client too well”.
The “Holocaust” exceptionalist law presumes not only a bottomline of
“obviousness” but also that any attempt by the lawyer to offer his/her
client’s evidential exhibits to prove the case will be “criminalised” as
a heretic and suffer incarceration. Attorney Nahrath and others are
always dancing on the wire.
No
wonder historical Revisionists are called religious heretics since the
International Guidelines for Teaching About the “Holocaust” on page 11
determine that: “Care must be taken not to disprove the deniers’
position through normal historical debate and rational argument”!
Even
in the Allied occupier’s land of Britain, not since 2008 has the BBC
permitted another World Service broadcast under the title “Why Can’t We
Question the Holocaust?” In this unique broadcast, when I and Jewish
Prof Deborah Lipstadt were invited as the main guests, on this hour-long
worldwide phone-in radio show, has the public had the normal
opportunity to hear some of the Revisionist victories presented (by
Renouf, much loathed by Lipstadt) instead of the omnipotent Hollywood
version of WW2 history (hear these two BBC radio progs at : http://www.
Ever
since the German ex-Constitutional Court Judges Hassemer and
Hoffmann-Riem called for the repeal of the “Holocaust”-denial laws,
there have been numerous attempts to enlighten and embolden the
law-makers and law-proponents in today’s Germany. These
ex-Constitutional Court Judges argued that the “Holocaust” denial law
was in contrary yo the Federal Constitution of the Bundesrepublik!
Notably these valiant attempts in Germany and Austria were made by the
late greats Ernst Zündel, Dr. Herbert Schaller, RA Manfred Roeder, RA
Jürgen Rieger, Gerd Honsik – and Horst Mahler, Sylvia Stolz, Germar
Rudolf, Udo Walendy, Henry Hafenmayer, Dr Rigolf Hennig, Werner Keweloh,
Dr Hans Berger, Günter Deckert, Wolfgang Fröhlich, Ursula Haverbeck,
Arnold Höfs, Sven Lobeck and Christian Haeger to name but a few. Today’s
opportunity by Alfred and Monika Schaefer may justly capture the global
tidal wave for this anti-debate law to be called into question and
repealed.
Alfred
Schaefer in person confirmed the report above given to me by Sylvia
Stolz. At 12.30 they returned to the court which has since resumed and I
await further news from the right end of the horse…
Meanwhile,
persons in the public gallery (only about 8-15 which included two
reporters from Japan) have recognised some of the Press as Antifa whom
they recall from Pegida demos. There are about 6 in the Press benches,
and one from Bildthe popular scandal sheet.
Henry
Hafenmayer, Alfred Schaefer, Michèle Renouf at Munich Courthouse
moments before the Schaufer sibling’s trial for Volksverhetzung/populace
incitement para 130
The SCHAEFER TRIAL in MUNICH,Day 1, AFTERNOON SESSION Monday July 2nd, 2018.
The
trial resumed at 12.30 following the two hours’ interruption while the
attorneys for Monika and Alfred Schaefer filed a demand that the
Chairmen of the four judges, Judge Hofmann, be removed from the Process
because of his evident bias against the Defendant Alfred Schaefer. The
Chairmen ruled that the trial would continue under his authority until
Wednesday July 4th when the matter would be weighed.
The
afternoon’s session commenced with the assistant of the State
Prosecutor (who was not named) handing Alfred an arrest warrant which
meant he must be taken into police custody (not jailed as such) until
the Judge decides on the new case of para.86 against him.
Monika
Schaefer achieved her common-sense input when, after she persisted that
she and the public gallery could not hear the proceedings, Judge
Hofmann finally permitted microphones to operate. By now already the
day’s session was half over! Alfred gave a four hour well-documented
presentation of why the Federal Republic is illegitimate. The Judge
complained at the “broader horizon” of the matters Alfred included. His
77 page statement was shortened to 65, yet even so, observers said
Alfred pulled no punches with his historical and current accusations in
support of his appeal for the dismissal of the case brought against him
and his honourable sister. At the end of this, after which the Judge had
declared that Alfred must be detained in police custody (as opposed to
jail) because of his suspect gesture, Sylvia Stolz exclaimed (but not to
the judge) that the Process was unbelievable: “This is terror”. After
all, Alfred’s disdain of Federal Republic law was of the essence to his
own defence!
When
Sylvia then declined to explain to the Judge (to whom she had not
directed her outrage) about what, perhaps, she meant by inquisitional
terror, she simply said “I am lost for words”… as were the stunned
public gallery who had never before witnessed such surreal “ criminal”
events. By now Attorney Wolfram Nahrath had removed his robe since the
Judge had ended the day’s session. Yet the Judge insisted Sylvia Stolz
had interrupted the proceedings rather than made her outcry allowable
after the afternoon session’s end. Sylvia was then given two days in the
cells for contempt of court. Oddly, the Judge failed to offer her the
usual option of a fine. Some in the public gallery wondered that perhaps
no such option was given in order to preclude Sylvia’s perspicacious
presence during the coming days.
The
State Prosecutor refused the request from Attorney Nahrath for the
Schaufer siblings to have a few moments to say goodbye. But the Judge
decided by himself to give Monika Schaefer permission to have five
minutes with her brother. He instructed the court clerk to note the
Protocol that first the public gallery must leave the courtroom,
presumably to avoid experiencing empathetically the moving pathos they
would witness passing naturally between these truly loyal siblings.
The trial continues at 12.30 on Tuesday 3rd July.
Michèle Renouf
www.jewishrepublic.com
Michèle Renouf
www.jewishrepublic.com
The SCHAEFER TRIAL in MUNICH,Day 2, AFTERNOON SESSION Tuesday July 3rd, 2018.
This
morning, Tuesday July 3rd 2018, on Day Two of the Schaefer sibling’s
trial, we learn that the period of punishment for Alfred (under para
86a) who was taken yesterday into police custody is over for the time
being. After today’s session he will be permitted to return home. Alfred
now has this further trivial case to face later in the lower court.
Alfred, ever-feisty, has now been offered the option of bail of 5000
euros to secure his release, though he will have another ludicrous
action taken against him for a suspect gesture! He also had to surrender
his passports – quite as if he could ever be a ‘flight risk’ as a man
completely determined to face down what he considers are his country’s
traitors and those swindle-speakers responsible for the “contamination”
of its citizens’ capacity for rational, healthy hatred of sociopathic
depravity and corruption.
The
trial resumed this afternoon at 12.30. Monika’s veteran attorney
Wolfram Nahrath will be presenting his 22-page argument against Para 130
of the law Volksverhetzung/populace incitement in which he
will raise the precedent of the two ex-Constitutional Court Judges
Hassemer and Hoffmann-Riem who, in 2006, called for the Repeal of this “
Holocaust”-denial law based on heresy values versus scientific attitude
(our Hellenic scientific attitude versus the “Holocaust” anti-rational
argument Teaching Guidelines).
Tomorrow
we shall learn whether the lead Judge Hofmann will have to step down
because of his evident bias against the defendants. The disdain of this
Judge for withholding due microphone use so both defendants and the
public gallery could hear the proceedings, and the ruling over the norm
of a ready glass of water for defendants, are but two of the
‘contrariwise’ obstructive aspects to the due basic rights of all
citizenry. These mocking obstructions give further surreality to the
conditions under which Germans and foreigners must encounter under the
Basic Laws in favour of prosecuting the expression of free opinion among
citizens and right to discuss normal historical source criticism
without legalese-protected exceptionalism.
The SCHAEFER TRIAL in MUNICH,Day 3, AFTERNOON SESSION Wednesday July 4th, 2018
Not
so incidentally, today it has been an ordeal simply locating another
venue with both electric outlet for my Mac plus WLAN (since yesterday,
one of our legal team sensed I was being observed by a recognised
policewoman who might just decide to do the usual and seize my laptop –
“so leave now!”). Conditions and situations for me to go on reporting
from here are unpredictable. All reminiscent of when I was advised to
leave swiftly after participating at a “holocaust” conference at the UN
parliament building in Brussels … having informed the assembly that the
document Netanyahu likes brandishing before the UN General Assembly is
the one Professor Robert Faurisson discovered and published in ca. 1976
which is simply a diagram of a small WW2 clothing disinfection gas
chamber. The Schaefer Siblings are “out to break all the thought crime
rules since the penalty is the same” they say! Their resonant question
here is “Do we live, or are we lived?”
Before
court prooceedings got underway, Alfred’s attorney Frank Miksche
learned that Judge Hofmann was not to be removed for bias, for he was
judged (from above) neutral since all judges are presumed to uphold his
attitude when serving this exceptionalistic law. The question is: Is
this law in accord with the Constitution? The case must go up to a
higher court in hopes of addressing this. Even so, RA Miksche caught
Judge Hofmann out as the latter had made a wrong statement. That is,
Alfred had not given him permission to accept a shorter version of his
Defence presentation to a mere 20 pages from the original 77. Nor was
Alfred prepared to permit cherry picking from his videos rather than
have the court watch his videos in full. Alfred is to have his videos
duly viewed in full in the courtroom tomorrow (Thursday).
During
the morning session it was Monika’s turn to tell of their family
dynamics. In the afternoon session, Alfred endorsed his sister’s closely
shared upbringing and adventurous hang-gliding near-death experiences
which served, as such brushes do, to stir one to do or die the way one
goes henceforth. The threat of blindness served to embolden him. A
fertile civic-minded atmosphere in which the sibling’s sense of fairplay
and loyalty thrived is indeed the prompt for their forthright approach
conscientiously to live their lives. The Process, as public gallery
eyewinesses remarked, had turned to matters emotional. And when the
State Prosecutor criticised Monika’s attorney RA Nahrath for introducing
an emotional tone, surprisingly the Judge chastened her (whose name we
are not told) not Nahrath.
Eyewitnesses
in the public gallery say they felt the siblings spread an aura of
uplift in the courtroom. Alfred says he wished to convey this by his
various telling of personal life-threatening experiences – for instance,
how his doctor brothers acted to save his impending blindness in the
left eye. From such frequent tests, Alfred believes he has “got guardian
angels” which make him fearless in the face of all adversity – a
formidable opponent to those who rely for their identity on a group
sense of god-awesomeship. Alfred the Siegfried who knows no fear! Just
the chap Wagner had in mind when he said in 1871 that German unification
already needed fearless emancipation from such god-awful influences.
For Alfred and Monika, nature and thoughts are to be explored, not
tyrannised. He said his father had received the Order of Canada for his
services as a medic to the welfare of the Arctic people in recognising
the way they live their lives affects their health. One might say Alfred
and his community-spirited sister do the same in their way with the
influences prevailing over what he calls “the gate keepers”. The Gate-Keepers is
the chief video he plans to screen for the court today. I have just
this very moment received a call from Alfred alerting me to rendezvous
at yesterday’s venue where I shall find out for you, all that has
transpired today!
Alfred Schaefer and Scientist of Law Sylvia Stolz see each freed after being taken from the courtroom under police custody!
Yesterday
at end of the day’s session, separately Alfred and Sylvia set off to
meet me in the Löhenbräukeller beer garden to discover – to each other’s
surprised delight – that each has been released! They had last seen one
another being taking into police custody directly from the courtroom.
Suddenly, to their mutual satisfaction (see pic attached), they find out
they had been, unexpectedly, freed. Having committed no actual harm
(i.e. no crime which is an act not a thought!) whatever, why would they
be treated as criminals at all? We all here hope for this outcome today
for civic-conscientious, harmlessly intelligent, good-natured Monika –
release from Munich’s high security prison after six months’ abuse for a
benign, videoed apology: “Sorry Mum I was Wrong about the Holocaust”.
As
it happened, Sylvia and Monika had travelled in the same police
transfer van to the prison though they had little chance to speak owing
to the noise of the others surrounding them. However, Sylvia found,
during the hour when inmates can make their walk that fellow prisoners
told her “how much they all love Monika”!
At
the close today’s court session, I have arranged to record an important
interview with Scientist of Law Sylvia Stolz. I will be asking her to
explain in a nutshell, why the Federal Republic itself is illegitimate.
Ex-Constitutional Court Judges Hassemer and Hoffman-Riem are quoted in
my 2006 “Ernst Zündel Unbowed” Telling Film that the “Holocaust” denial
law is even contrary to the Constitution of the Federal Republic! This
is surely the cornerstone of Alfred’s case and the world needs this
chance to grasp it …before it can fall…. for he and Monika are intend on
emboldening that day.
This
week’s 4 days’ trial sessions will pause and return for the concluding
dates of 12, 13, and 16 of July. Beforehand I shall be making available
the feisty interview with Alfred in his garden; and the interview I am
about to make with Sylvia the Scientist of Law on that key to Germany’s
sovereignty, that graspable cornerstone.
“No surrender”!
Michèle Renouf
Michèle Renouf
——————————————————-
Friday afternoon update, July 6th
Greetings
all: today at 2pm at the home of Alfred Schaefer he and I had just
finished watching and discussing matters re his videos he was succeeding
to screen in full in the Munich courtroom …and then his wife laid table
for lunch after I removed my Laptop …and so I went to wash my hands.
I
then heard Police knocking on my bathroom door announcing their
arrival. It was as if one were suddenly in a nightmare Hollywood movie
about a police state action! At first I thought maybe high-spirited
Alfred was playing a joke. On opening my bathroom door, there stood 2
armed officers awaiting me.
I handed over my passport; they said they’d come to arrest Alfred. I saw 5 of them handcuff my host.
Taking
with him the little packed cheese lunch his experienced wife swiftly
made and handed to one officer for her husband, Alfred was hauled away
for reasons the police declined to explain to me. Possibly it was about
something he had perhaps said when yesterday he had duly turned up at
the police station, as he has to do twice per week since he is out on
bail. Whatever this “crime” was, he’s again in a police cell now. His
wife advised that I and HH should disappear asap in case police returned
knowing now that we two were there, easy to haul in for good measure.
Vot a business. Cat and mouse – but at least valiant Frau Schaefer made sure we each retrieved the cheese!
Saturday evening update, July 7th, 2018
The Schaffer Sibling’s Trial sessions are only over for the four days of the past week. It resumes next Thursday 12th, Friday 13th, and Monday 16th July, then a few extra days during August. It is being extended because Alfred insists he must be permitted to screen his ‘awakening’ in full, and now the court requires his videos in English to be translated professionally into German. Right now Alfred is locked away in Stadelheim Prison, same one as his sister Monika since January 3rd 2018 (and Sylvia Stolz for two days last week). The photo I took of them and sent you taken in the beer garden refers to when they each saw they had been released. Tomorrow or Monday Albert will be brought before the Haftrichter/Magistrate to face another charge. A Judge at the District Court issues the arrest warrant after the arrest of a suspect and checks whether it can be upheld. I am unclear as to what Aflred is now being charged. On Monday matters will be made clearer.Meanwhile concerning Monika Schaffer, whose grotesque imprisonment continues, here is a flavour of her civic-minded, valiant character as she appears in this 11 minutes' private Winter Solstice gathering VIDEO captured in December 2017 when Monika came to visit me for the first time at Haus Richberg in Hessen, just days before her startling arrest on January 3rd 2018: http://www.heritageanddestiny.com/?s= renouf+Dresden+speech “No surrender”!Michèle
No comments:
Post a Comment
Anything to say about anything.....