Careful ladies - they may behead you for this - and the Snowman!

Fatwa declared against snowmen!

They've really got the hump! Fatwa declared against snowmen made to look like camels and Arabs in Saudi as they 'represent Western values'

• Recent snow in Saudi Arabia saw Saudis eagerly building snowmen 
• But a religious scholar has decreed that snowmen are an insult to Islam
• Mohammed Saleh Al Minjed decreed living creatures cannot be recreated
• The ruling says that inanimate objects - and food - can be replicated 
• Saudis took to social media to voice their dismay at the ruling
  A prominent religious scholar in Saudi Arabia has given the cold shoulder to snowmen – by issuing a fatwa against them.
  A recent snowfall in the middle eastern country saw Saudis eagerly building snowmen and even snow camels.
  However, Mohammed Saleh Al Minjed decreed that building snowmen – or indeed creating any living creature out of snow – was an insult to the Islamic religion.
  He declared that inanimate objects such as ships and buildings could be imitated – or food – but not animals.
  He wrote: 'God has given people space to make whatever they want which does not have a soul, including trees, ships, fruits, buildings and so on.'
  The fatwa - or religious ruling - was given a frosty reception on social media sites by some people.
  
  On Twitter users writing in Arabic and identifying themselves with Arab names joined in the debate. 
  'They are afraid for their faith of everything ... sick minds,' one Twitter user wrote.
  Another posted a photo of a man in formal Arab garb holding the arm of a 'snow bride' wearing a bra and lipstick. 'The reason for the ban is fear of sedition,' he wrote.
  A third said the country was plagued by two types of people: 'A people looking for a fatwa for everything in their lives, and a cleric who wants to interfere in everything in the lives of others through a fatwa,' the user wrote.
  Sheikh Munajjid had some supporters, however. 'It (building snowmen) is imitating the infidels, it promotes lustiness and eroticism,' one wrote.
  'May God preserve the scholars, for they enjoy sharp vision and recognise matters that even Satan does not think about.'
  
  
  
  This then is the religion which both Britain and Europe seem destined to live under in around forty years time? Funny? Yes. Frightening? Definitely!
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

 

Cameron - Muslim Imam or Prime Minister?

The piece below, where I put how long before Cameron says the words I had thought were just to outrageous to be true - WERE TRUE! A NF comrade has sent me the original piece from of course that pinko rage - the Guardian, I am reprinting it so you can read it in all it's multi-racial liberal glory.

What goes through the mind of a man like Cameron to do this? What goes through the minds of the tens of thousands of other Cameron's who run our country at all levels.

I have taken to calling them the Liberal-Oligarchs, but I no longer feel that is an apt enough description.

Cameron and all his like, at all levels of government, the Civil Service, the Education System and the Police Force who think on these lines are pseudo-Marxists!

Marxism is against Nationalism

Marxism says there is no difference between races

Marxism says that we must move through Globalism towards a One World State

Cameron is all of these, as are his clones infesting our nation.
These pseudo-Marxists are mentally ill in my opinion, for no normal healthy person would think and act and base their lives and our Nation's life on the things these pseudo-Marxists believe and do - and enshrine in laws - laws designed to beat down the White people of Britain.

If a British Prime Minister had done this 100 years or so ago, he would not only lose office but quite possibly be taken to a mental institution!

The liberalism that has given rise to these crypto-Marxists is a type of sickness brought on by an educational system steeped in anti-British ideas which it passes on, like an infectious disease to our children. It passes it on to, in their domination of our media at all levels.

Cameron - this is what mass non-White immigration has brought us - and of course, just by coincidence - the killers were Muslims!

Read this and decide why YOU should join Britain's last hope - the National Front

"What I learnt from my stay with a Muslim family

Last week, Tory leader David Cameron spent two days in Birmingham with the Rehmans

The challenges of cohesion and integration are among the greatest we face. I wrote in these pages in January that we cannot bully people into feeling British: we have to inspire them. Last week, I spent two days staying with Abdullah and Shahida Rehman and their family in Birmingham. The experience has strengthened my conviction about the right way to build a more cohesive Britain.

First, a concerted attack on racism and soft bigotry. You can't even start to talk about a truly integrated society while people are suffering racist insults and abuse, as many still are in our country on a daily basis. We must also be careful about the language we use. No Muslim I've ever met is offended by Christmas, or supports its replacement with 'Winterval'. But many Muslims I've talked to about these issues are deeply offended by the use of the word 'Islamic' or 'Islamist' to describe the terrorist threat we face today.

We do need greater understanding of the true nature of the terrorist threat. There's too much complacency about it among non-Muslims, and too much denial of it in the Muslim community. But our efforts are not helped by lazy use of language. Indeed, by using the word 'Islamist' to describe the threat, we actually help do the terrorist ideologues' work for them, confirming to many impressionable young Muslim men that to be a 'good Muslim', you have to support their evil campaign.

There's no easy answer. I don't think this is something that can or should be addressed through a government edict, but the BBC, as our national broadcaster, has both the responsibility and the opportunity to give a lead.

The second priority for building cohesion in our country is more integration: people from different backgrounds sharing public services, neighbourhoods, social networks. As I found in Birmingham, this is something they naturally want to do, and local institutions - including religious ones - provide the opportunity

For example, those who say that faith-based schools hinder integration are wrong. The three Muslim children in the household I stayed with go to a local faith school - a Jewish faith school, which is massively oversubscribed, has a mixed roll with some 60 per cent of pupils from Muslim families, around a third from Birmingham's Jewish community and the rest a mixture of Christians and Sikhs. My obvious question to Abdullah - why do you, a practising Muslim, send your kids to a Jewish school? - does not get just the obvious answer: good discipline and good results. On top of that, the very fact that the school has a faith and a strong ethos is seen, at least by Abdullah and his family, as a positive advantage.

And the third step in promoting integration is to ensure there's something worth integrating into. 'To make men love their country,' said Edmund Burke, 'their country ought to be lovable.' Integration has to be about more than immigrant communities, 'their' responsibilities and 'their' duties. It has to be about 'us' too - the quality of life that we offer, our society and our values.

Here the picture is bleak: family breakdown, drugs, crime and incivility are part of the normal experience of modern Britain. Many British Asians see a society that hardly inspires them to integrate. Indeed, they see aspects of modern Britain which are a threat to the values they hold dear - values which we should all hold dear. Asian families and communities are incredibly strong and cohesive, and have a sense of civic responsibility which puts the rest of us to shame. Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.

Saying goodbye to Abdullah I was given gifts of T-shirts, shoes and a traditional robe which he said would be perfect for any visit to Pakistan. It's another reminder that integration is a two-way street. If we want to remind ourselves of British values - hospitality, tolerance and generosity to name just three - there are plenty of British Muslims ready to show us what those things really mean."

Cameron - tell that to the parents and family of Gunner Lee Rigby!

David Cameron has welcomed London's hosting of the Ninth World Islamic Economic Forum

As far as we know the above quote is

not a quote from Cameron - but how long until we hear it?
The clock is TICKING!

 

David Cameron has welcomed London's hosting of the Ninth World Islamic Economic Forum, being held for the first time in a city outside the Muslim world. The Prime Minister promised to show an expected 1,800 visiting politicians, financiers and businesspeople from 115 countries that the UK is a "first-class destination for trade and investment from the Islamic world and beyond".

Among national leaders expected to attend this week's gathering are Malaysian PM Najib Razak, the Sultan of Brunei, King Abdullah II of Jordan, President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan, Crown Prince Salman of Bahrain, President Abdul Hamid of Bangladesh, Prime Minister Abdelilah Benkirane of Morocco and Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif of Pakistan.

With the total value of assets compliant with Islamic principles growing by 150% since 2006, global Islamic investments represent an increasingly important market, predicted to grow to £1.3 trillion by 2014. Mr Cameron said he wanted Britain to be a "global partner of choice for Islamic finance".
"I am delighted that this week London will become the first city outside of the Islamic world to host the World Islamic Economic Forum, which shows very clearly that Britain is open for business," said Mr Cameron.

"With some of the world's fastest growing markets in Muslim majority countries, demand for Islamic finance is growing and this presents major opportunities for the UK. I am determined that we do everything we can to make Britain the best place to start, grow and do business and this demonstrates that we are a global partner of choice for Islamic finance with the expertise, innovation and services that are fundamental to the industry's growth.

"We are in a global race and as London host the World Islamic Economic Forum, we will be backing our businesses seeking new markets and banging the drum for Britain to show that we are a first-class destination for trade and investment from the Islamic world and beyond.

"As part of our plan to help Britain succeed, we will be championing and showcasing our skills and expertise to overseas investors in order to strengthen our economy for the benefit of hard-working people all across the country."

Last year at the eighth World Islamic Economic Forum, deals worth around £5.8 billion were struck!

There are already more than 20 banks in the UK that offer Islamic financial products and services - more than in any other Western country - and the London Stock Exchange has had 49 "sukuk" listings, valued at 34 billion US dollars over the last five years. Some 25 law firms in the UK operate substantial Islamic finance departments.

Chairman of the World Islamic Economic Forum, Tun Musa Hitam, said: "This is the first time that the World Islamic Economic Forum is being held in a non-Muslim European capital. (Well, non-Muslim in the short term! - NS)

"The choice of this vibrant, cosmopolitan, yet ancient city is no coincidence. London is home to a vast multicultural population and a great gateway for trade and commerce, finance, culture, ideas and philosophy, to name a few. Organising the World Islamic Economic Forum in London represents our first step in promoting direct engagement in Europe as much as with it. It is also a continuation of our efforts to build bridges worldwide through business for the greater good of mankind."

 

Well folks - so now we know - Cameron hasn't got Islamaphobia!!!

 

National Front = No Sharia Law Britain!

EDL in Leeds this Saturday

Our friends (?) the Zionist loving EDL are coming to my home city this Saturday. The row is all over the Lingfield Public House being turned into a Muslim centre. The EDL are opposing it on the grounds that it is not wanted by the mostly White estates of Moortown and Cranmer Bank.
The Lingfield was a typical estate pub in its day and my late Uncle Mick (Michael McCarthy) spent his afternoons there playing dominoes ( a Yorkshire working class obsession that I fail to see the point in, but then again I am a chess snob).
Uncle Mick - and I knew his views well - would be spitting fire on Saturday and probably outclassing the EDL with his fiery Celtic temper - Mick had no time for Cool Multi-Racial Brittania - as I haven't either.
This demo comes along on top of the news of the near miss bombing of the EDL demo in Dewsbury last year.
What a great pity the EDL has to be pro-Zionist. I could easily support a street movement called the British Defence League (or better the White Defence League), and I am sure 90% + of those attending including many locals will only know of the English Defence League's anti-Muslim stance.
Here's the latest report below our very own Yorkshire Evening Post ( with its once resident Commie B* - AFA reporter, Peter Lazenby.

Lazenby by the way hasn't retired from journalism and now writes unsurprisingly for the Communist 'Morning Star' and the ultra-left 'Red Pepper' -

                                       - oh why not here's a picture of the scumbag!

 

Anyway and now - hold yer breath - I give you the latest EDL report...

 

FAR right demonstrators are planning a protest at a former Leeds pub earmarked for conversion into an Muslim-run community centre.

Saturday’s rally by the English Defence League (EDL) outside the old Lingfield pub in Alwoodley comes just four days after six men pleaded guilty to a failed plot to blow up a similar demonstration in Dewsbury last year.

A counter demonstration by Unite Against Fascism is also planned.

Mohammed Arif, of UK Islamic Mission (UKIM), which is behind the community centre proposal, said: “It’s really unfortunate that the EDL are bringing people in from outside the locality to create an issue when we have been very transparent about what we are doing, both in the planning process and during consultation meetings.

“However, we are not going to get involved.”

UKIM wants to create a centre with a public gym, IT suite, library, training facilities. and a prayer room for up to 70 worshippers.

The plan has been at the centre of a storm of controversy, with more than 400 letters of objection over traffic congestion and noise concerns.

The night before a planning meeting to discuss the application in February, the words ‘no mosque’ were daubed on the building.

Councillors approved the plan despite the protests.

Supt Martin Snowden, from North East Leeds Police, said: “We have a duty to protect the right to peaceful protest, and plans are in place so those demonstrating are allowed to do so while causing minimum disruption to local residents and businesses.

“Forming part of our plans there will be an increased police presence in the Moortown area on Saturday to reassure local people and ensure that any offences are dealt with in a positive manner.”

     Above: The Lingfield Pub - once a gathering place for

local White residents.....

 

No such thing as a 'Moderate' Muslim?

I have just finished reading "The Death Of Face" which slams the very notion that you can have 'moderate' Muslims and 'fundamentalist' Muslims. I am reprinint below parts of an article written by Sam Harris on Islam which makes VERY interesting reading:....(I must point out by the way that Sam Harris though being very incisive on the subject of Islam is also opposed to White Nationalism.)

(This was written shortly after the Danish cartoon uproar)
In recent days, crowds of thousands have gathered throughout the Muslim world—burning European embassies, issuing threats, and even taking hostages—in protest over 12 cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad that were first published in a Danish newspaper last September. The problem is not merely that the cartoons were mildly derogatory. The furor primarily erupted over the fact that the Prophet had been depicted at all. Many Muslims consider any physical rendering of Muhammad to be an act of idolatry. And idolatry is punishable by death. Criticism of Muhammad or his teaching—which was also implicit in the cartoons—is considered blasphemy. As it turns out, blasphemy is also punishable by death. So pious Muslims have two reasons to “not accept less than a severing of the heads of those responsible,” as was recently elucidated by a preacher at the Al Omari mosque in Gaza.
The religious hysteria has not been confined to the “extremists” of the Muslim world. Seventeen Arab governments issued a joint statement of protest, calling for the punishment of those responsible. Pakistan’s parliament unanimously condemned the drawings as a “vicious, outrageous and provocative campaign” that has “hurt the faith and feelings of Muslims all over the world.” Turkey’s prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, while still seeking his nation’s entry into the European Union, nevertheless declared that the cartoons were an attack upon the “spiritual values” of Muslims everywhere. The leader of Lebanon’s governing Hezbollah faction observed that the whole episode could have been avoided if only the novelist Salman Rushdie had been properly slaughtered for writing “The Satanic Verses.”
Let us take stock of the moral intuitions now on display in the House of Islam: On Aug. 17, 2005, an Iraqi insurgent helped collect the injured survivors of a car bombing, rushed them to a hospital and then detonated his own bomb, murdering those who were already mortally wounded as well as the doctors and nurses struggling to save their lives. Where were the cries of outrage from the Muslim world? Religious sociopaths kill innocents by the hundreds in the capitols of Europe, blow up the offices of the U.N. and the Red Cross, purposefully annihilate crowds of children gathered to collect candy from U.S. soldiers on the streets of Baghdad, kidnap journalists, behead them, and the videos of their butchery become the most popular form of pornography in the Muslim world, and no one utters a word of protest because these atrocities have been perpetrated “in defense of Islam.” But draw a picture of the Prophet, and pious mobs convulse with pious rage. One could hardly ask for a better example of religious dogmatism and its pseudo-morality eclipsing basic, human goodness.
It is time we recognized—and obliged the Muslim world to recognize—that “Muslim extremism” is not extreme among Muslims. Mainstream Islam itself represents an extremist rejection of intellectual honesty, gender equality, secular politics and genuine pluralism. The truth about Islam is as politically incorrect as it is terrifying: Islam is all fringe and no center. In Islam, we confront a civilization with an arrested history. It is as though a portal in time has opened, and the Christians of the 14th century are pouring into our world.

Islam is the fastest growing religion in Europe. The demographic trends are ominous: Given current birthrates, France could be a majority Muslim country in 25 years, and that is if immigration were to stop tomorrow. Throughout Western Europe, Muslim immigrants show little inclination to acquire the secular and civil values of their host countries, and yet exploit these values to the utmost—demanding tolerance for their backwardness, their misogyny,  and the genocidal hatred that is regularly preached in their mosques. Political correctness and fears of racism have rendered many secular Europeans incapable of opposing the terrifying religious commitments of the extremists in their midst. In an effort to appease the lunatic furor arising in the Muslim world in response to the publication of the Danish cartoons, many Western leaders have offered apologies for exercising the very freedoms that are constitutive of civil society in the 21st century. The U.S. and British governments have chastised Denmark and the other countries that published the cartoons for privileging freedom of speech over religious sensitivity. It is not often that one sees the most powerful countries on Earth achieve new depths of weakness, moral exhaustion and geopolitical stupidity with a single gesture. This was appeasement at its most abject.