Nationalist Sentinel Bulletin No.4 has just gone out to all subscribers. Do not miss your free weekly issue of this e-zine. Just send in your e-mail address with "Subscribe" as the title and we will add you...
Here's an article from this week's issue:
What type of Government for White Nationalism? Should - and let's hope it will - a White Nationalist Government ever wield power in Great Britain then what sort of Government should it be?
At present we have a form of 'democracy' which is about as democratic as Mugabe's Zimbabwe. Never a day seems to pass without another outrage of double-dealing, horse-trading or downright theft being reported about a sitting MP. All parties are involved in this endless round of corruption, and each new government seems to be more corrupt than the last."A definition of democracy is Democracy is a form of government in which all eligible citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives. Democracy allows eligible citizens to participate equally."
Looking at the above statement and asking the question - is that the type of government we have in Britain today? The answer is a resounding NO!
At present we have a form of 'democracy' which is about as democratic as Mugabe's Zimbabwe. Never a day seems to pass without another outrage of double-dealing, horse-trading or downright theft being reported about a sitting MP. All parties are involved in this endless round of corruption, and each new government seems to be more corrupt than the last."A definition of democracy is Democracy is a form of government in which all eligible citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives. Democracy allows eligible citizens to participate equally."
Looking at the above statement and asking the question - is that the type of government we have in Britain today? The answer is a resounding NO!
Taking part means being allowed the dubious privilege of putting a cross on a piece of paper once every four years and voting for three or four candidates with exactly the same policies.
On all the major issues - immigration, the EU, economic policy, defence, agriculture, industry and unemployment, they all bleat out their party line and on nearly every occasion they bleat out the same answers as each other. When Enoch Powell had the courage to stand up at a General Meeting of the West Midlands Area Conservative Political Centre in 1968 and gave his now famous "Rivers of Blood" speech, the whole nation rose behind him but that did not stop the Zionist controllers of the Tory party, led by the despicable Edward Heath, kicking Powell out of the Shadow Cabinet and eventually out of the Tory party - although his views most likely helped the Tories win the 1970 General Election.
Such a brave man is an extreme rarity in Westminster. His famous speech can be read in full - "Rivers of Blood"
Enoch Powell - one brave man amongst a government of swindlers
The question is - can this 'democracy' ever be made to work. I do not think so. I have never made any secret about my anti-democratic stance, but some have taken this to mean that I am for some sort of one leader, party state. I am most definitely not. I believe that the government of Britain should be based on a meritocracy. A Meritocracy is a political philosophy that holds power should be vested in individuals according to merit. Advancement in such a system is based on perceived intellectual talent measured through examination and/or demonstrated achievement in the field where it is implemented.
I think that the National Front should discuss this as a policy which we can show to the public and the media and it has two great advantages:-
It sets us most definitely away from the ZOG controlled parties and their maggot infested version of democracy - and if properly implemented it would give Great Britain a new type of government that would be a real novelty - a government that would work for the good of the Nation and the Race.
the nearest I have seen advocated on meritocratic lines is the suggested Corporate State which the late Sir Oswald Mosley ascribed to. Mosley said of his Corporate State idea,,,,
"The main object of a modern and Nationalist movement is to establish the Corporate State. In our belief, it is the greatest constructive conception yet devised by the mind of man. It is almost unknown in Britain; yet it is, by nature, better adapted to the British temperament than to that of any other nation. In psychology it is based on teamwork; in organisation it is the rationalised State. We have rationalised industry and most other aspects of life, but we have not rationalised the State. Yet the former makes the other the more needful, lest the economic power of man should pass beyond the power of his control."
I would suggest that ALL NF members and supporters interested in developing NF policy and philosophy should read "The Coming Corporate State" - a fuller description can be found HERE
"The main object of a modern and Nationalist movement is to establish the Corporate State. In our belief, it is the greatest constructive conception yet devised by the mind of man. It is almost unknown in Britain; yet it is, by nature, better adapted to the British temperament than to that of any other nation. In psychology it is based on teamwork; in organisation it is the rationalised State. We have rationalised industry and most other aspects of life, but we have not rationalised the State. Yet the former makes the other the more needful, lest the economic power of man should pass beyond the power of his control."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Anything to say about anything.....