"Race doesn't exist - the big liberal lie"

When I first joined the National Front way back in 1967 (I often wonder how many founder members are still active - or even alive?), I had no knowledge of the role of Jewish influence in world history and in current affairs.
Neither had I a great understanding of Race and Racial differences.
One of the people I have to thank for starting on the road to becoming a White Nationalist was Matin Webster ( who became the best National Activity Organser I have ever known Sadly, personal attributes mean that Martin's obvious talents as both a great speaker, writer and organiser have been negated by the downside of what White Nationalists accept as both moral and ethical value)

The books Martin listed as ones I should read included H.B Isherwood's Racial Contours; Frank L. Britton's Behind Communism (which opened my eyes to the Jewish role in formenting the Russian Revolution);Nesta Webster's World Revolution.
Two other books I read were White Power and Tomorrow The World both by Lincoln Rockwell, and both of which along with his From Ivory Tower to Privy Wall, I always recommend to men and women joining the ranks of White Nationalism.
Racial Contours is an excellent book and although dating somewhat, is still well worth reading.
One of the most essential books for those White Nationalists who wish to know a lot more about race is the mammoth Race by John Baker. I keep this voume on my beside table as it the best proof not only of the existence of Race but an academic revelation into all the various facets of Race and the Races of the World.

This short article is penned because the constant denial by our Liberal Oligarchy that 'race is only skin deep' and their huge effort to take the very idea out of the social and political equation of Race and racial realities and Race's huge impact on history and the rise and fall of civilisations, is constantly thrust in our faces.
Race only exists in Great Britain when ZOG wants it to exist. On one hand they are denying racial differences and the strengths and weaknesses of the races of the world, yet on the other they are passing legislation making a proper debate on the subject of Race not only impossible but also illegal.
The truth about Race lies somothered by the draconian laws of our ZOG masters ( who, by the way are quite strident if their own racial values are questioned, or even mentioned!)

My academic background is one of Computer Science and Computer Programming. I have completed five City and Guilds and a Diploma and a Certificate from the Open University gained over the last ten years.
I have to admit then that when I make statements concerning Race, then I do so as a layman.
One has only to open one's eyes to see that there are great differences between an Australian aborigine and a Chinese man. Or an Eskimo (Innuit! God give me strength). Or the differences between a person of Negroid extraction and a Red Indian (oops, I mean Native American - even though there is strong evidence that Norsemen reached the Americas before the Red Indians. In fact the study of Kennewick Man suggest that Whites may have been in North America long before the Norse).

(Left - Kennewick Man)

There are seven major racial groups in the world and I am going to be brave and say that I disagree with Isherwood's idea that there are only five major races.
I would put this forward for study and expansion, and would be more than pleased to hear fellow White Nationalist's view and ideas on the 'Seven Races of the World'.

The Races of Man
Caucasoid - the White Race, covering North America, Europe and Australasia
Mongoloid - the race whose features can so clearly be seen in Chinese, Japanese and other areas North of the Himalayan range.
Asiatic - Covering lower Asia, India, the Islands of the Philippine Sea, also covering Pakistan and many of the Middle Eastern countries. The Semites and Hamites I would classify as sub-Races of the Asian Race
Australoid - the Australian aborigines and the Tasman Islanders (but NOT New Zealand)
Amerind - the peoples who dominated North America before the coming of the White man.
Amazonian - the natives of South America, who used to be classified as Amerind but who bear NO resemblance to them. Compare a picture of an Apache for instance against that of one of the primitive tribes inhabiting the Amazon Basin.
Negroid - native to the continent of Africa and easily recognisable.

There are two groups which do not fall into any of these seven categories are they are the Hottentots and Bushmen of South Africa (who had far more primitive biological make-ups than the Negroids.
The other one is the Polynesian, including the Maori of New Zealand and the Hawaiins and the population scattered across the wide area of the Pacific.
It may be in time that the Bushmen and Hottentots are recogised as a race in their own right and so to, the Polynesian (who may have a strong admixture of ancient Caucasian blood. I emphasis the word 'may' here)

So next time your child comes home from school with his or her daily liberal indoctrination from their PC Teaching crew, that race doesn't exist and  only nasty racialists such as those in the National Front. Educate and show them that there are vast differences between the races. They are your children and they we hope that many of them will fill out the ranks of the World's White Nationalists.

I will finish on a quote I find of vast deepness even though it is mere five words - 'Race is the only Truth' (Arnold Leese)

My reply on Stormfront to a poster saying we should accept homosexuals.

I have included the post in question and my reply.

Originally Posted by Poacher The homosexuals I have met have always been far more "politically aware" than equivalent normal folk. their sexuality has helped radicalise them. In rejecting these people , or even threatening them with harm, we alienate them from our message and hand our enemies, our evil and well funded enemies, - a group to frighten and organise against us. Many in our movement propagate this attitude - either through macho posturing or (often I suspect) through closet sympathy/denial. Those who protest loudest are often the most suspect! Considering the problems that threaten our race and the biological warfare immigration is committing against our future, sexuality is the least of our concerns. While those who control our media promote overt queers to brainwash our children. The odd discreet homosexual is no threat... they have always been there and they will always be there. The Hollywood queers promote a bad example..... but then often you find it is pretence - for example Johnathan Ross or David Walliums.. turn out to be secretly heterosexual! Divide and rule.

This is an argument which on moral grounds falls short of having any ideological value. What's wrong with the odd queer coming into the Movement; or the odd Jew; or the odd Sikh - seems we have been down this road already...
I personally find the idea of two men engaging in sexual deviant activities totally repulsive. This does not make me a hidden or closet queer - which is an argument that the Pink Mafia usually throw back at we 'homophobes'.
I could equally say 'Why are you making a case for accepting them? Are you in fact....". I am sure you are not but you see what I mean.
I would not feel comfortable in a meeting room knowing homosexuals are present and accepted - or for that matter lesbians. Its just bloody disgusting.
The way the law is going, I cannot reuse to serve a homosexual if I ran a shop nor refuse to accept them to book a room if I was a hotel owner. (Perhaps even this posting is illegal for saying nasty things about homosexuals - I am not advocating 'queer bashing' which is infantile and illegal under normal Common Law, but I am advocating the repeal of the Sexual Offences Act of 1967, up to which time, homosexuality was a CRIMINAL OFFENCE in the UK.)
To correct a previous poster - Martin Webster was NEVER Chairman of the National Front. He held two jobs - that of National Activities Organiser and that of Editor of National Front News.
I got on well with Webster and call me credible, but I did not suspect nor accept he was a homosexual, the idea seemed surreal.
However when the West Yorkshire NF of which I was organiser started losing valuable members to BM then I took things a lot more seriously.
Webster came to speak at a Leeds meeting and at the end of his speech he was asked by two members whether he was a homosexual.
We all expected a denial.
Quite the opposite, Webster not only admitted he was but to make matters worse, went on to attack his questioners for not realising that homosexuals had built Western civilisation - a theme he still holds true to, to this day, and has repeated to me in the odd email I get from him if he receives any bulletin attacking poofs.
When later revelations showed that he was co-habiting with the NF's National Treasurer, Michael Salt, (with whom he still lives with today),then that broke the back of the Front - the hard liners following JT into the NNF.
Webster's homosexuality was then used against him by the now racial renegade Pearce,with Griffin to oust Webster. He was sacked from his paid position.
On a deeper note - White Nationalism is the political expression of Nature. Yes homosexuality does exist in nature and in a very, very few animals other than homo sapiens. But it is an aberration for Nature's main goal is to REPRODUCE, and same gender sex makes this impossible. With the correct application of Social Darwinism, homosexuality could be eradicated as it would have been had man not interfered with Nature's hard rules - in fact, I suspect that the arrival of AIDS was one of the way's Nature started to show us we were wrong to promote homosexuality.
However, one of the main enemies of White Nationalism in Britain is from what I call the 'Pink Mafia'. The odious Peter Tatchell might be the face of 'gaydom' but the Pink Mafias tentacles reach into government, the civil service and most certainly the City of London.
Open the doors to our enemies if you like by admitting homosexuals, but accept the consequences of the slippery road which the BDP as set its face too - the oblivion now facing the BNP.
Raven 1066