"Race doesn't exist - the big liberal lie"

When I first joined the National Front way back in 1967 (I often wonder how many founder members are still active - or even alive?), I had no knowledge of the role of Jewish influence in world history and in current affairs.
Neither had I a great understanding of Race and Racial differences.
One of the people I have to thank for starting on the road to becoming a White Nationalist was Matin Webster ( who became the best National Activity Organser I have ever known Sadly, personal attributes mean that Martin's obvious talents as both a great speaker, writer and organiser have been negated by the downside of what White Nationalists accept as both moral and ethical value)

The books Martin listed as ones I should read included H.B Isherwood's Racial Contours; Frank L. Britton's Behind Communism (which opened my eyes to the Jewish role in formenting the Russian Revolution);Nesta Webster's World Revolution.
Two other books I read were White Power and Tomorrow The World both by Lincoln Rockwell, and both of which along with his From Ivory Tower to Privy Wall, I always recommend to men and women joining the ranks of White Nationalism.
Racial Contours is an excellent book and although dating somewhat, is still well worth reading.
One of the most essential books for those White Nationalists who wish to know a lot more about race is the mammoth Race by John Baker. I keep this voume on my beside table as it the best proof not only of the existence of Race but an academic revelation into all the various facets of Race and the Races of the World.

This short article is penned because the constant denial by our Liberal Oligarchy that 'race is only skin deep' and their huge effort to take the very idea out of the social and political equation of Race and racial realities and Race's huge impact on history and the rise and fall of civilisations, is constantly thrust in our faces.
Race only exists in Great Britain when ZOG wants it to exist. On one hand they are denying racial differences and the strengths and weaknesses of the races of the world, yet on the other they are passing legislation making a proper debate on the subject of Race not only impossible but also illegal.
The truth about Race lies somothered by the draconian laws of our ZOG masters ( who, by the way are quite strident if their own racial values are questioned, or even mentioned!)

My academic background is one of Computer Science and Computer Programming. I have completed five City and Guilds and a Diploma and a Certificate from the Open University gained over the last ten years.
I have to admit then that when I make statements concerning Race, then I do so as a layman.
One has only to open one's eyes to see that there are great differences between an Australian aborigine and a Chinese man. Or an Eskimo (Innuit! God give me strength). Or the differences between a person of Negroid extraction and a Red Indian (oops, I mean Native American - even though there is strong evidence that Norsemen reached the Americas before the Red Indians. In fact the study of Kennewick Man suggest that Whites may have been in North America long before the Norse).

(Left - Kennewick Man)

There are seven major racial groups in the world and I am going to be brave and say that I disagree with Isherwood's idea that there are only five major races.
I would put this forward for study and expansion, and would be more than pleased to hear fellow White Nationalist's view and ideas on the 'Seven Races of the World'.

The Races of Man
Caucasoid - the White Race, covering North America, Europe and Australasia
Mongoloid - the race whose features can so clearly be seen in Chinese, Japanese and other areas North of the Himalayan range.
Asiatic - Covering lower Asia, India, the Islands of the Philippine Sea, also covering Pakistan and many of the Middle Eastern countries. The Semites and Hamites I would classify as sub-Races of the Asian Race
Australoid - the Australian aborigines and the Tasman Islanders (but NOT New Zealand)
Amerind - the peoples who dominated North America before the coming of the White man.
Amazonian - the natives of South America, who used to be classified as Amerind but who bear NO resemblance to them. Compare a picture of an Apache for instance against that of one of the primitive tribes inhabiting the Amazon Basin.
Negroid - native to the continent of Africa and easily recognisable.

There are two groups which do not fall into any of these seven categories are they are the Hottentots and Bushmen of South Africa (who had far more primitive biological make-ups than the Negroids.
The other one is the Polynesian, including the Maori of New Zealand and the Hawaiins and the population scattered across the wide area of the Pacific.
It may be in time that the Bushmen and Hottentots are recogised as a race in their own right and so to, the Polynesian (who may have a strong admixture of ancient Caucasian blood. I emphasis the word 'may' here)

So next time your child comes home from school with his or her daily liberal indoctrination from their PC Teaching crew, that race doesn't exist and  only nasty racialists such as those in the National Front. Educate and show them that there are vast differences between the races. They are your children and they we hope that many of them will fill out the ranks of the World's White Nationalists.

I will finish on a quote I find of vast deepness even though it is mere five words - 'Race is the only Truth' (Arnold Leese)

Thoughts of the day

Thoughts of the day - many and myriad...

Reading the paper and came yet again across a word I really hate - 'Eurosceptic'.

It labels anyone who wants to get the UK out of Europe with a tag that sounds like something you'd rub on a boil.

Nick Griffin, in one of his many of his incarnations, produced the rather good book -"Who are the Mindbenders". OK - yes, the guy is rat-fink but "The Mindbenders" is still a very eye opening read. Which then brings me back to that 'eurosceptic' word.

They are not just bending our minds, they are twisting our words too.
I though of some alternatives, and the best I can come up with 'Britain Outers' or maybe 'No-euro'ers'. Its difficult because of course I am suffering from "Europhobia".

 

Just re-reading Lincoln Rockwell's book "White Power". This is a brilliantly written book and an absolute MUST for all White Nationalists!

Its available from Amazon - I urge you to get one now.

On the subject of using the term "White Power", it was one we used a lot back in the day, but one we never use these days. If anyone this is of a legalist leaning, can they please tell me if using 'White Power' breaks the Race Act (as everything else seems to do as well).

 

I have nearly finished this week's "The White Nationalist" and will be sending it out tomorrow. We are at Number Nine now - so if you haven't subscribed yet, then get too it - email nationalistfreepress@gmail.com

 

Good to see all those bikers descend on Washington in unbelievable numbers yesterday - the anniversary of 9/11. Obama issued a permit to a Fundamentalist Muslim group but refused one to the 100% White motorcyclists who wanted to protest the fact that Islamics were going to march through Washington on the anniversary of 9/11 - the irony is - the Muslim group which got the permit has only  eight members!

Book Review - HATE -George Lincoln Rockwell and the American Nazi Party

BOOK REVIEW: Hate - George Lincoln Rockwell ad the American Nazi Party

I joined the National Front as a founder member, way back in 1967. I knew a few things about British Nationalism - enough to know I was a British Nationalist - but the deeper and more important aspects of what were to become my White Nationalist World View, and that view with very little modification I hold to today and if anything, in the light of recent events both in the United Kingdom and in the world, even more fervently than before.

So what has that got to do with a book review about George Lincoln Rockwell and the American Nazi party (ANP)? 

One of the first contacts I had as a National Front member was Alan Holmes (I have no idea where and what he is doing these days) who received a lot of literature from America.

Alan was also the Sheffield organiser of the NF and Sheffield National Front in 1967, was far bigger than the fledgling NF Local we had in Leeds. Leeds NF had eight members, whereas Sheffield NF had around twenty - along with its own bookshop and private meeting room, which impressed the hell out of me.

OK, back to Rockwell. Alan Holmes passed on to me regularly the stuff that was coming in from the United States, periodicals such as 'Thunderbolt' edited by Ed Fields, and which I think is still published today under the name of 'The Truth At last'.

Its was very radical stuff with no holds barred on the Jewish question as an instance.

Alan also passed on to me three other publications - the ANP's "Stormtrooper" magazine which was filled with 'action reports' showing uniformed Neo Nazis picketing and pulling off the most outrageous stunts - 'White Power' - the monthly newspaper of the ANP and most significantly 'In Hoc Signo Vinces' (Under This Sign We Conquer) which blasted into a new form my own ideas on propaganda and organisation.

The ANP had at that time started to change its name to 'The National Socialist White People's Party' which was the next and more up-market phase of its development. It also had a new quarterly publication - 'National Socialist World' which was edited by Dr. William Pierce who went on to found the National Alliance.

I was a very active member of the National Front then (still am today only in differing roles as age takes its toll), and Rockwell's ideas made sense. I disagreed with his using the swastika as a symbol and calling his outfit the American Nazi Party. In Great Britain those names are a sure way to political suicide. Rockwell did it to get publicity and he did - it worked in America.

It will NEVER work in Britain. The groups I have seen using Nazi symbolism have died off pretty quickly OR attracted such weirdos and oddballs to them as to become just a damned nuisance to we serious White Nationalists.

On August 25th, 1967, I was dumbfounded when I saw on the news that Rockwell had been shot dead in Arlington, Virginia by a disgruntled former ANP member, John Patler - his real name was Yanacki Patsalos, and he had been the editor of 'Stormtrooper' magazine.

We will never know what Rockwell would have achieved, especially when his assassination occurred just at the time he was leading a transition from 'Nazi' to National Socialist and laying down plans to recruit a broader spectrum of people.

A few weeks ago I bought the book 'Hate' from  Amazon and expected the usual hatchet job. I was greatly surprised that its author - William H Schmaltz takes a very objective look at Rockwell and his activities. He goes over Rockwell's strengths, and also his weaknesses - including the arrogance which Rockwell often showed to people at the wrong time, yet also how charming and how much charisma the man had too,

The book is well worth reading for all students of politics and especially if you are interested as I am, on agitation and propaganda.

Amongst some very far out stuff there was also some very clever stuff too.
"HATE -George Lincoln Rockwell and the American Nazi Party" is readily available on Amazon it is a very worthwhile read.

Love Rockwell or hate him - you will find that whatever you might think of him, he was never ever boring, and his fast frenetic political style still leaves that unanswered question - Which way would White Nationalism have gone in America had Rockwell lived?

George Lincoln Rockwell  - (March 9, 1918 – August 25, 1967)

Just what CAN we say?

Back in the early 1960's, the then British National Party led by John Bean contested two council elections in Southall - and achieved a respectable result - 13.5% in Glebe Ward and 27.5% in Hambrough Ward. Their main campaign slogan was 'Keep Britain White'.
Now after decades of suppression by ever tighter Race and Religious 'Hatred' laws - the use of the slogan KBW (as was seen on many walls around London in those days) would guarantee you a jail sentence.
The term was TOO EFFECTIVE and got the BNP a lot of votes - and if you try using it now you would most definitely be breaking the Race Acts.

Since the first Race Relations Act in 1965, it has become ever more tyrannical with each successive rash of new laws -

The Race Relations Act 1965

The Race Relations Act 1968

The Race Relations Act 1976

The Race Relations Amendment Act 2000

(I have left the links in so you can study these oppressive pieces of legislation.)
It is interesting to see which MP's have been behind most if not all anti-free speech legislation - a more anti-British set of neo-Communist Labourites and active Zionists were behind them. Greville Jenner, then a leading Jewish MP was a prime mover behind much of the legislation.

This all begs the question -"Just what can White Nationalists say in their propaganda?"
Is the term WHITE POWER illegal - nobody seems to know. Is the term 'White Pride' offensive - again when a White Nationalist tried to register copyright of this term in America he had it refused on the grounds it was racially offensive. The US government however HAS approved the following copyrights:-
“African Pride,” “African Man Pride,” “Asian Pride,” “Bahama Pride,” “Black Pride,” “Brazilian Pride,” “China-Pride,” “Chippewa Pride,” “Choctaw Pride,” “Colombian Pride,” “Cuban Pride,” “Dakota Pride,” “Dominican Pride,” “El Salvador Pride,” “Ecuador Pride,” “Gay Pride Apparel,” “Guyanese Pride,” “Havana Pride,” “Honduran Pride,” “Indian Pride,” “Jamaica’s Pride,” “Jewish Pride,” “Kwanzaa Pride,” “Long Beach Lesbian and Gay Pride,” “Mayan Pride,” “Mexican Pride,” “Native Pride!,” “Nicaraguan Pride,” “Orgullo Hispano” (Hispanic Pride), “Orgoglio” (Hispanic–”Great Pride” (supremacy?)), “Qisqueya Pride” (Dominican Republic Pride), “Rainbow Pride Coach,” “Red Pride,” “San Diego Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Pride,” “Spanish Pride,” and “West Indian Pride.”

White Pride - although not illegal the US Pro-Zionist government say no to its legal incorporation. I expect that if we tried to copyright White Pride and White Power in the UK, we would get refused, although Black Power and Asian Power - as well as the obnoxious 'Gay Pride' and 'Gay Power' - and this last one being almost compulsory!

I have written on this whole subject at some length before and my article "The Death of Free Speech" can be found HERE.

Be careful what you say in your leaflets and articles. The Race Laws and now the Religious 'Hatred' Laws are very underhand and both incorporate those dreaded words 'likely too cause'. In other words they are catch all laws to be used at the whim of our ZOG masters. So slogans such as KBW are now unusable - how long before we are fined or jailed for saying WHITE PRIDE or WHITE POWER?

"The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely, but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used against them - except force."
John Bryant